and Karniadakis, G.E., The Wiener–Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24 (2), pp. Xiu, D., Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton University Press, 2010. Sudret, B., Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions, Reliab. and Tempone, R., Approximation of quantities of interest in stochastic PDEs by the random Discret L2 Projection on polynomial spaces, SIAM J. and Knio, O., Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification, Springer, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s0047-4 Blatman2009phdīlatman, G., Adaptative sparse Polynomial Chaos expansions for uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis, Universit'e Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, 2009. Roy et al.: Comparison of Polynomial Chaos and Gaussian Process surrogates for uncertainty quantification and correlation estimation of spatially distributed open-channel steady flows. Scalable Performance Visualization for Data-Parallel Programs. Hypothetical Outcome Plots Outperform Error Bars and Violin Plots for Inferences About Reliability of Variable Ordering. Jessica Hullman and Paul Resnick and Eytan Adar. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 19:29-45, 2009 Hullman2015 Rainbow plots, bagplots and boxplots for functional data. 8th International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output. et al.: Numerical stability of Sobol’ indices estimation formula. et al.: Sensitivity Analysis of Spatial and/or Temporal Phenomena. International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements. et al.: Numerical studies of the metamodel fitting and validation processes. Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. et al.: Trends in sensitivity analysis practice in the last decade. and Saltelli A.: Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis. Keane.“Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization”. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science. “Optimization using surrogate models and partially converged computational fluid dynamics simulations”. Bohling2005įorrester, Alexander I.J, et al. G.K.Robinson.“That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects”. “Early South African geostatistical techniques in today’s perspective”. When (ish) is My Bus? User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems. Jones et al.: Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions. Roy et al.: Resampling Strategies to Improve Surrogate Model-based Uncertainty Quantification - Application to LES of LS89. Scheidt: Analyse statistique d’expériences simulées : Modélisation adaptative de réponses non régulières par Krigeage et plans d’expériences, Application à la quantification des incertitudes en ingénierie des réservoirs pétroliers. Sacks et al.: Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. Iooss: Numerical studies of space filling designs : optimization of Latin Hypercube Samples and subprojection properties. “Réduction de dynamique par décomposition orthogonale aux valeurs propres (POD)”. “An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Karniadakis: “Gappydata:ToKrigornottoKrig?”. Najm, Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 41 (1) (2009) 35–52. Williams: Gaussian processes for machine learning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |